Trusted Canadian Immigration Lawyers
Canada’s permanent residence (PR) admissions declined during the first seven months of 2026 compared with the same period in 2025. Despite this overall decrease, several countries recorded notable increases in PR grants. Turkey, Iran, Nigeria, Sudan and Syria saw higher numbers, while Indian citizens experienced the largest decline.
These contrasting figures highlight how Canada’s immigration patterns are changing across different nationalities. But do rising admission numbers indicate better opportunities for people hoping to settle in Canada? The answer depends on individual eligibility, immigration pathways and current selection criteria.
|
Ansari Immigration Law helps applicants understand their options, evaluate their circumstances and navigate Canada’s permanent residence process with greater clarity. |
Canada granted permanent residence to 222,625 people between January and July 2026, compared with 246,580 during the same period in 2025. This represents a reduction of 23,955 people, or approximately 9.7%.
Canada’s 2026 immigration plan sets a target of 380,000 permanent residents. Separate one time initiatives operate outside that annual target, so the overall figures should be interpreted alongside the government’s different admission measures.
The country of citizenship data shows that the decline was uneven. Some nationalities recorded increases despite the lower national total, while others experienced substantial reductions.
|
Measure |
Jan to Jul 2025 |
Jan to Jul 2026 |
|
Total PR grants |
246,580 |
222,625 |
|
Change in PR grants |
— |
-23,955 |
|
Percentage change |
— |
-9.70% |
|
Indian citizens granted PR |
68,690 |
53,285 |
An important distinction matters here. These figures count people granted permanent resident status by their recorded country of citizenship. They do not necessarily count people who physically moved to Canada from that country during the period. Some applicants may already have been living in Canada on temporary status.
Read More: Canada Express Entry Eligibility and Application Guide to understand how the system works.
Several countries recorded higher numbers of permanent resident grants between January and July 2026. Turkey had the largest increase in absolute numbers, while Uganda recorded one of the sharpest percentage gains.
|
Country of Citizenship |
Jan to Jul 2025 |
Jan to Jul 2026 |
Change |
|
Turkey |
1,050 |
2,995 |
+1,945 |
|
Iran |
4,175 |
5,495 |
+1,320 |
|
Nigeria |
10,450 |
11,565 |
+1,115 |
|
Sudan |
2,565 |
3,640 |
+1,075 |
|
Syria |
2,195 |
3,260 |
+1,065 |
|
Mexico |
3,265 |
4,140 |
+875 |
|
Uganda |
395 |
1,100 |
+705 |
|
Sri Lanka |
2,025 |
2,500 |
+475 |
|
Iraq |
620 |
1,080 |
+460 |
|
Ghana |
1,115 |
1,565 |
+450 |
Turkey’s PR grants increased from 1,050 to 2,995, a rise of 1,945 people or approximately 185.2%. This was the largest absolute increase among the countries listed in the comparison.
The rise is notable because the number nearly tripled within the same seven month period across the two years. Even so, the figures alone do not establish which immigration programmes produced the increase.
Iran recorded 5,495 PR grants in January to July 2026, up from 4,175 in 2025. This represents an increase of 31.6%.
Uganda’s PR grants increased from 395 to 1,100, a rise of approximately 178.5%. Sudan, Syria and Iraq also recorded increases exceeding 40%. Mexico’s total reached 4,140, while Sri Lanka’s rose to 2,500. Nepal, Bangladesh, Kenya and Burundi also recorded increases during the same comparison.
These results show that Canada’s PR intake changed in different ways across nationalities. Still, an increase in grants should not be treated as proof that applicants from a particular country receive preferential treatment under every immigration programme.
The figures reveal changes in the composition of Canada’s permanent resident intake, but they do not explain every reason behind those changes. Permanent residence can be granted through different routes, including economic immigration, provincial nomination, family sponsorship and humanitarian programmes. Each route has its own eligibility criteria and selection process. Several factors can influence country-level totals:
The available country figures do not identify the precise reason for each increase. It would be inaccurate to attribute Turkey’s growth, for example, to a particular immigration stream without programme-specific data.
Several nationalities recorded fewer permanent resident grants in 2026 than in the same months of 2025. India recorded the largest reduction, followed by France and Eritrea.
|
Country of Citizenship |
Jan to Jul 2025 |
Jan to Jul 2026 |
Change |
|
India |
68,690 |
53,285 |
-15,405 |
|
France |
7,385 |
4,295 |
-3,090 |
|
Eritrea |
6,195 |
3,910 |
-2,285 |
|
Cameroon |
12,565 |
10,875 |
-1,690 |
|
China |
13,490 |
11,870 |
-1,620 |
|
Morocco |
4,285 |
3,145 |
-1,140 |
|
Afghanistan |
4,430 |
3,335 |
-1,095 |
|
Tunisia |
3,380 |
2,305 |
-1,075 |
France recorded a 41.8% decline, while Eritrea’s total fell by 36.9%. Tunisia and Morocco also experienced substantial reductions. China’s PR grants dropped by 12%, from 13,490 to 11,870. Despite the reduction, Chinese citizens remained among the largest groups receiving permanent residence.
The Philippines recorded a much smaller decrease of 2%, from 16,325 to 16,005. This difference becomes important when examining each country’s share of Canada’s total intake. The figures describe changes in approvals, not a direct measure of how difficult immigration has become for every applicant from these countries.
The guide to Canadian provinces and PR pathways can also help you compare available options.
India remained Canada’s largest country of citizenship for new permanent residents during the first seven months of 2026. Yet the number of Indian citizens granted PR fell by 15,405 compared with the same period in 2025.
This reduction accounted for approximately 64.3% of Canada’s total decline of 23,955 permanent residents.India’s share of all PR grants also fell from approximately 27.9% in January to July 2025 to 23.9% in the corresponding period of 2026.
These numbers matter for Indian citizens planning their next steps, but they do not establish that Canada has introduced a country-specific restriction on Indian applicants. The data does not identify which immigration programmes caused the decline.
Your eligibility still depends on the programme you apply under, your qualifications, work experience, language ability and other relevant criteria. A lower national total does not automatically mean that your individual application will be refused.
Country-level statistics can help you understand changes in immigration admissions. They cannot tell you whether you qualify for permanent residence or predict when you will receive an invitation. If Canada PR is your goal, focus on the factors that directly affect your application.
For a closer look at candidate rankings and invitation patterns, read the related article on October 2026 Express Entry predictions and CRS trends.
Disclaimer! This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Immigration policies, eligibility requirements and PR figures may change. Consult a qualified immigration lawyer to understand your individual circumstances and available options.
Turkey recorded the largest increase in absolute numbers, rising by 1,945 grants between January and July 2025 and the same period in 2026. Iran, Nigeria, Sudan and Syria also recorded substantial increases.
PR grants to Indian citizens fell by 15,405, a reduction of approximately 22.4%. The country-level figures do not identify the immigration programmes or specific causes behind the decline, so they cannot establish a single explanation.
No! Higher national totals do not guarantee better approval chances for individual applicants. Eligibility depends on the relevant immigration programme, qualifications, work experience and other selection criteria.
Ansari Immigration Law can review your circumstances and explain the Canadian permanent residence pathways that may apply to you. Your immigration history, qualifications and work experience help determine which options are worth assessing.
Canada’s 2026 permanent residence figures highlight changing admission patterns across countries, but they do not determine an individual’s eligibility or guarantee an invitation. Your options depend on factors such as your qualifications, work experience, language proficiency and the requirements of the immigration pathway you pursue.
Ansari Immigration Law helps individuals understand their Canadian immigration options and assess the requirements relevant to their circumstances. Through its Canadian immigration legal services, you can seek guidance on potential pathways, eligibility concerns and the next steps to consider for your permanent residence application.